Topic: EA Maturity Model
Day/Time October 20, 2017 - 11AM PST, Noon Mountain, 1PM Central, 2PM Eastern (7PM GMT)
Adobe Connect: http://confer.uw.edu/EA -Audio is only on the phone, not Adobe.
EA Maturity Model Discussion
Links to Work -
Presentation on EAMM-edu
- Useful for EA practitioners in HigherEd
- Understand stages of maturity of EA practice (Start to optimal stage of maturity) that applies to HigherEd
- Started work in May, 2017
- Open for Review from broader community
- What’s in EAMM-edu
Example scenarios
Maturity Model Structure contains
Dimensions (Attributes vs levels of maturity)
Set of activities to reach a level of maturity
o Level 5 – Improving
§ Level name needs to be resolved (suggestions – adapting, optimizing)
o Was there a consideration to go with level 0
§ Yes, but decided on going with level 1
§ Model recognizes it is open-ended on both sides
§ Qs. Having a conversation around EA – level 0?(Ans. Probably fits in level 1)
§ Qs. Practice not formally sponsored – level 0? (Ans. Probably fits in level 1)
o What processes do institutions have in place to move from “Defined” to “Managed” maturity?
o Is there an assessment guide?
§ Group working on one.
o Can there be real life scenarios/examples at each of the levels?
§ Jim started a page to share practices in community.
§ These scenarios could be a measure of milestones achieved not necessarily a way to assess how well they are done.
§ Add an experience/scenario/article/case study/lessons learnt to a cell in the maturity model
o Email to ITANA EAMM-edu (insert email) to share feedback
- Business Architecture working group or an ITANA track
o Chair – Dana Miller (Miami)
o Robert Snyder (Penn State) interested in joining.
o Someone from Harvard interested in joining. Didn’t catch the name.