You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 31 Next »

Coordinates

250 East Wisconsin Avenue, 18th Floor

July 22: 12:30 - 17:00

July 23: 09:00 - 17:00

July 24: 09:00 - 12:00

Physics Building 13:00 - 17:00

Agenda

  • Review 0.9.4 open tickets with intent to tag (tick)
  • Review UX/UI priorities
    • Exposing ChangelogBehavior history (CO-1109, CO-1110(tick)
    • Normalizing data UX (or lack thereof)
  • Scalability issues
    • Set up demo instance with large data set for testing?
  • 1.0.0 issue triage (tick)
    • Identify blockers vs "nice to have" (tick)
    • Target end of August (tick)
  • Proxy IdP / Embedded Attribute Authority
  • Reporting (tick)
    • Requires reporting infrastructure
    • Not 1.0.0
    • Report request examples:
      • CSV output of first name, last name, email, for a COU in CO – to send a report to COU admin
    • Reports that operate over people, groups, cous
  • Recommendations to deployers for setting up a QA tier(tick)
  • Project QA and Release Planning strategy (CO-975) (tick)
    • Release Candidates
      • Script to follow when doing acceptance testing
      • Selenium demonstration, choices
    • JIRA management of bugfix releases (eg: 1.0.1)
    • Strategy for managing different versions of documentation (wiki; ie: functionality for 0.9.3 vs 1.0.0)
    • Notes / Assertions:
      • Will move to semantic versioning

      • Will move to release candidates - full releases depend on QA / acceptance testing

      • Version planning begins upon completion of current version and depends on funding sources and other constraints

      • Version documentation: label versions as appropriate (and with discipline); may be driven by outside documentation requirements

      • See also: https://bugs.internet2.edu/jira/browse/CO-975
  • August Albany f2f?
  • TechEx logistics?

Action Items

  • Scott to complete CO-1045 by Monday, July 27.
  • 0.9.4 tag by Monday, July 27
  • Heather to review and revise setting up a QA tier with an eye towards language suited for VOs that do not have as much operations experience as say an NREN data shop.

 

  • No labels