Versions Compared

Old Version 30

changes.mady.by.user Leo Fernig

Saved on

compared with

New Version 31

changes.mady.by.user Leo Fernig

Saved on

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

 

5.1 Architectural reviews?

5.2 SOA included in reviews?

5.3 Processes for publishing contracts?

5.4 Change management process for contracts?

5.5 A central repository for service contracts?

UBC

2

2

1

1

N

Michigan

2

2

1

1

N

Cornell

2

1

2

1

N

Georgetown

2

1

1

1

N

Ohio State

2

 

2

2

N

UMUC

2

2

1

2

N

UofT

2

2

2

2

Y

UW

3

4

4

3

Y

UM UW-W Madison

2

3

1

2

N

UC-Irvine

3

2

2

2

N

Colorado

2

2

1

2

N

Indiana IU

2

2

1

2

Y


5.6

Additional information on the management of service contracts

...

Colorado
Just beginning to clearly define service contracts - clearly a goal, but pretty early in the process

IndianaIU
Question 5.5 is kind of a "maybe". Our repository of service contracts is defined in WSDL form and  is included in the Kuali Service Bus registry.

...

UW
Yes: has made us more aware of the need to communicate between silos
UM-W
It has informed it. It has pointed out possible directions

Colorado
Not yet

IndianaIU
Not very much, we don't have governance bodies who are responsible for vetting changes to our service contracts. Most of that is handled adhoc by the technical teams.

...