...
Roll Call East to West
Scribe for callAgenda Bashcall – Rupert Berk
Itana Administration
2015-2016 Close-out round table
...
- Yale is also turning towards ITSM and establishing itself as a service-oriented organization.
Chris:
- Itana should do a working call on API and metrics. See Michigan's one page summary: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1rKE9gNkDnoSKvcY-fP3ku8_Xem-Ybs28ao99QQAlWng/edit
- Itana should also do more working meetings in general
Louis:
- It's not always that an institution cannot do more with metrics; often, there's a lack on desire to do more.
- We know how to assess learning outcomes, but choose not to in a lot of cases. Sometimes it's antithetical to our R1 culture to focus on instruction over research.
Ashish:
- We have a new CIO, a big proponent of EA.
- The big challenge for me is how to do integrations. How do we get to a future state of APIs and microservices, given the distributed nature of the environment and the time it will take to share information and train?
JJ:
- University of Wisconsin working on ref models to better inform decision-making.
- Using EA methods to help assess IT projects, particularly those bigger than a single department.
- Challenge: How to engage EA with broader efforts in IT and U?
- For instance, when the CIO has a data governance initiative, how does EA get engaged at the right time? How to move beyond IT?
- Louis: Would like to follow up on how do we get provost funding for IT initiatives?
Louis:
- At Yale, we were put into that position, we didn't request it.
- The higher ed pendulum swings between centralization (efficiency) and distribution (value-centered). Right now, with a relatively new provost, there's a swing to value-centered, and EA is being asked to help. EA is responding to the provost.
Chris:
- We struggle with positioning all the time. We have trouble being perceived as more than solution architects.
Louis:
- Outside of higher ed, we see businesses responding to IT trends and drivers, but we don't see that in higher ed.
Jim:
- Here are the artifacts that Rupert and Piet are working on to communicate strategy up, down, and across.
Dan:
- We are working on enhancing our MESAs to capture more strategy, and where possible, to interact with business partners to do so.
Jim:
- I'm working on post-go-live governance for our major HRP project. What needs to be governed, how, what triggers for change come from central and distributed units at different levels.
- We are deriving governance requirements from process flow analysis.
- Eventually, from this come implications for our change request management tool (Service Now).
- Work has gone well by focusing on what governance needs to do (focus on process) without falling into power-grabs and other politics.
Louis:
- This is brilliant because it enables a focus on operationalizing governance.
Jim:
- It encourages agreement without the food fight.
Whiteboard
From the Adobe Connect whiteboard:
...
From the Adobe Connect chat window:
Ashish Pandit: is the location for f2f finalized?
Louis King - Yale: at educasue in anaheim, ca
Jim Phelps: It will be a pre-conference seminar that you register for separately.
Jim Phelps: https://www.educause.edu/annual-conference/agenda-and-program
Jim Phelps: It will show up at this link once they push out the agenda
Jim Phelps: The date is Tuesday Oct 25th.
Ashish Pandit: Thanks
Chris Eagle (Michigan): https://docs.google.com/document/d/1rKE9gNkDnoSKvcY-fP3ku8_Xem-Ybs28ao99QQAlWng/edit
Chris Eagle (Michigan): one page summary of our Strategy Metrics
Jim Phelps: Chris Eagle should "The amount spent on strategic projects increases over time." be "percentage spent over time instead"?
Chris Eagle (Michigan): yes. however, at this point, some of our metrics are limited by the data we can gather
Chris Eagle (Michigan): we think we might be able to get a list of all projects that advance the strategy, but we're not sure we can (at this time) get full IT spend on campus, in order to make a %
Ashish Pandit: It would be great if you can share the presentation. Thanks