...
Heather Flanagan, Stanford (chair)
Jim Leous, The Pennsylvania State University
Chris Hubing, The Pennsylvania State University
Tom Barton, U. Chicago
Digant Kasundra, Stanford
Scotty Logan, Stanford
John Robertson, Stanford
Dave Donnelly, Stanford
RL "Bob" Morgan, U. Washington
Steve Olshansky, Internet2
Emily Eisbruch, Internet2 (scribe)
*New Action Items*
Wiki Markup
Wiki Markup
\[AI\] (Ken) will get product names from the Dutch collaboration report.
Wiki Markup
Wiki Markup
*Carry Over Action Items*unmigrated-wiki-markup
\[AI\] (Digant and Scotty) will ask OOI again if Drupal \ -\- instead of Alfresco \ -\- is acceptable for content management.
\
[AI\] (Scotty) will send out to the group a list of APIs for the Domestication Guide.
\
[AI\] (Bob) will send links to the group on the invitation problem.
\
[AI\] (Digant) will write up how to integrate with setup wizard for the Domestication Guide.
\
[AI\] (Ken) will ping Frank Siebenlist from Argonne National Laboratory, who is interested in COmanage.
\
[AI\] (Digant) will create COmanage video #2, when the improved Collabmin GUI is available.
\
[AI\] (Scotty and Digant) will redo COmanage video #1 to correct a few audio issues. \\
*Discussion*
COmanage Status
...
Scotty will make this new VM version available to the Penn State group for early evaluation.
Wiki Markup
Ken's Report
Ken and Jim Leous met briefly with NSF OCI leadership at the Internet2 Fall Member Meeting, who was dealing with a request from the Obama transition team on possible research spending initiatives. Ken and Jim continued the conversation with the new NSF program officer overseeing Internet2 Middleware-related projects they sponsored. COmanage was mentioned, but there was not a chance to do a demo. They will engage further in the future.
There was a lot of interest in COmanage at the European meetings in Utrecht in early December. Ken forwarded a contact to Tom and Digant of a person leading the Dutch federation in building collaboration platforms. There was a study in Dutch (not yet translated into English) of 8 or 9 projects addressing collaboration platforms. But COmanage is perceived as being furthest along and also has the added advantage of leveraging Grouper.
Wiki Markup
The GFIVO (Newcastle group) project in the UK has been working with Grouper to apply it to federated groups. That group will be interested in looking at COmanage at a broad level.
...
The COmanage website needs some updating, including being sure, if possible, that the forthcoming demo comes up when one googles "COmanage demo."
Wiki Markup
The need to update COmanage video 2 and video 3 was mentioned, with the understanding that first priority for Digant right now is development work.
...
Chris asked if there are plan to implement JIRA as a part of COmanage. An issue is that JIRA can do external authentication and can do external groups. But JIRA can't do both at same time unless external authorization is also LDAP.
Wiki Markup
Limiting Groups for an Application
...
SteveO mentioned the benefits of having a test instance of COmanage (perhaps on online demo) that could be experimented with. It was agreed that this would be a good marketing and outreach tool to work on sometime in 2009.
Action Items in JIRAunmigrated-wiki-markup
\[AI\] (Heather) will record action items from COmanage calls as JIRA tasks.\\ \\ \\ \\ \\
Emily Eisbruch, Technology Transfer Analyst
Internet2
emily@internet2.edu
office: +1734-352-4996 | mobile +1-734-604-5562
...