Participants

  • Brett Bieber (UNL)
  • Benn Oshrin (SCG)
  • Jeff Capehart (UFl)
  • Ann West (I2/InCommon)
  • Mike Grady (Unicon)

Notes

  1. Discussion of what would be considered successful outcome of working group
    1. Proof of Concept
    2. Some indication that approval from audit would be likely, perhaps by leveraging internal audit participants' institutions
    3. Patterns for deployment
  2. Discussion of “step down assurance”, whereby assurance qualifiers are dropped as IAP-specific failed authentication thresholds are reached
  3. Concerns about using UDP to transmit logs – can TCP used instead?
  4. Similarities to University of Chicago “Monitor and Remediate” approach for AD
  5. Impact of 72 hour window for calculating compliance
  6. Brett is interested in a POC by August 1

Action Items

  1. Set up a table of contents to facilitate design contributions for each component
  2. schedule another ad hoc call for July before considering regularly scheduled calls
  • No labels