Notes from the 2013 Quilt InCommon Federation Workshop

http://www.thequilt.net/index.php/events/246-2013-quilt-incommon

Admin/Policy track

David's asks ("shopping list") on behalf of Alaska:

1. flexible model of partners: no layer 3 REN for Alaska; still makes sense to create identity federation & identity services (hosted by UA or…)

2. hierarchical federation w/ InC - our state/regional Fedation is IdP in InC that in turn trusts constiuent's IdPs and can relay assertions up the chain to InC SPs.

3. road show to convey the value of identity federation: a realistic working "demo" to illustrate the value (don't understand without seeing; chicken/egg…)

4. generic support & tools with wide application so that we don't have to re-invent them multiple times and can interoperate at higher level of functionality:

Pilot discussion

a "cloud starter pack"

Discussion at my (dabantz@alaska.edu) table of bundling services requiring federated identities to be attractive to K12s:  

Idea is to bundle these services as part of federating, and focus more on these end user services than the underlying enabling technologies of federated identities and SSO.