Problem

Access rules for many applications and services cannot be derived from an authoritative source and must therefore be managed in a more ad hoc fashion. This pattern is characterized by the fact that access is manually managed by individuals or self sign-up, not identified registrars.   In some cases, authoritative data exists, but is difficult to feed in to the IdM system.   In other cases, membership in an access group is entirely left up to individual users or departments to maintain.

Solution

Ad-hoc, static group lists can be used when there is no good way to dynamically manage membership.  Managing the group in a central IdM system allows the group membership to be used for multiple provisioning and access management decisions that would otherwise have to be managed in each application.  (Similar to white lists.)

There may be optional content or services that are offered by the institution that require attributes or group membership in order to participate or not. In addition, there may be information about oneself (person attributes within a directory service) that the user may elect to have public or private. In these cases, it is desired that the users manage and control this access and content, since the items described are optional or user preference.

Examples

Graphics (click on them to view full size)