OSIdM4HE-Strategy&Org. call, 5pm - 6pm (ET) Friday, 8/19/2011

Participants

 
 
AGENDA

1. Convene

2. Agenda Bash

3. AI review

• [OSIdM4HEteam:RL-Bob] Documenting the gaps that have no team (yet). AuthN is one example.
• Done Draft charter/position paper for S&O Team with thoughts on how we make progress toward our goals
• Done Draft someone from the Access Management Team to join S&O so we have all teams represented on our calls
• Done Create wiki page for our IAM Market Survey planning
• Done Ask SteveO to create @internet2.edu mailing list for the S&O Team and subscribe all members

4. Review Charter/Position Paper (HamptonS)

• DedraC: Actual university needs-based use case driven design; TomB: One of requirements that org should address: incorporating univ-based dev/impl. projects.
•  

5. Review Bill Yock's draft on Investment and Governance Models

• Contributing partner w cash rather than in-kind developer FTE, as a Contributing Partner
  • MOU or agreement on expenditures; 
  • BY: E.g., MOU each site kicks in 4 FTE; could be that those 8 FTE build out KIM; the same 8 may collaborate on building out Grouper.
  • BennO: Sliding scale; JASig hat on: we need to be flexible enough to welcome contributions from individual donors.  TomB: If there's a venture partner, it's singular; may be looking at an amalgam of efforts.
  • BillY: Needs to be more than a single partner. Most Kuali projects are incubated via several institutional agreements for particular engagement. Very hybrid model.
  • BillY: Kuali roadmap has IAM a couple years down the road, may be quite willing to partner with something like OSIdM4HE to get the IAM work done sooner.  E.g. HR payroll & Student have a big interest in this.  The gov. structure has to meet the requirements of the partners.  If Kuali is not in full control, perception of risk; however, they're at risk because the resources aren't there. Split off the IAM roadmap
  • JacobF: I like fact that the hidden benefit is getting to piggy-back on a lot of institutional maturity.  Discrete ventures that have a relationship w existing initiative, Kuali. Acutely concerned with sustainability. committment at institutional level
  • TomB: Must be built here syndrome related to that. Would be hard for PennState.
  • If IU commits n FTE, LIGO wants one feature.  
  • Benn w Jasig hat: this
  • TomB: Bill, thanks!  I'm on vacation next week. KeithH, I'll call on Saturday
  • Hampton IRC roadmap, Jacob? 

6. Begin Planning for Marketing Survey

7. Explore Need for a Cross-Team Set of Enterprise Infrastructure Requirements

8. Review New Action Items