Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

Item

Description

Proposed syntax

Gateway Identifier

A value that uniquely identifies the gateway used (if any)

URI

Social Provider Identifier

A value that uniquely identifies one of the social providers (e.g., one for Google, Facebook, Twitter, Yahoo,....)

URI

Display Name

A human-friendly representation of the authenticated user's name

displayName

Given Name

 

givenName

Surname

A surname or surname component

sn

Principal Name

A scoped user identifier

ePPrincipalName

Email Address

The user's email

mail

Persistent Identifier

A unidirectional identifier, unique to a triple of IdP, SP and user

ePTargetedId

 

 

 

...

Conversation points and contexts in which they are discussed:

...

Conversation Point

Context 1: Federation centric ‘Social’ Identity Service

Context 2: Institutional centric ‘Social’ Identity Service

Context 3: Federated SP, SP  centric ‘Social’ *Identity *Service

Context 4: Standalone Service (non federated)

What are the dimensions of ongoing support for the given context? (e.g costs borne by SP's, impact to end users...)





How should required attributes be dealt with?

 

 

 

 

When 'user' is specified, what are the possible ways to appropriately identify them with a unique identifier?