...
| Line Number | Current Text | Proposed Text / Query / Suggestion | Proposer | +1 (add your name here if you agree with the proposal) | Action | 1
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 79-81 | The R&S registration criterias is fuzy and have given unpredictability in a service fulfills a the criteria or not when you look over federation boundraries. It's better to have a clear defintion of what you mean in the document. | Pål Axelsson, SWAMID | |||
| 117-119 | Whether you support the automatic release mechanism required by the REFEDS entity categories or not, you can at least use these templates to standardize attribute release to individual SPs. | It states automatict release is required by the entity categories but that is not true. In personalized it's stated "An Identity Provider indicates support for this entity category by exhibiting the entity attribute in its metadata. Such an Identity Provider MUST, for a significant subset of its user population, release all required attributes in the bundle defined in Section 5 to all tagged Service Providers, either automatically or subject to user consent or notification, without administrative involvement by any party.". This means that thoose identity providers expressing support in metadata must do automatic release but if you don't express support in metadata you can still release attributes based on for example an manual informed decisions for entities. | Pål Axelsson, SWAMID | ||
See Also