Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

Conversation Point

Applicable to any Context

Context 1: Federation centric ‘Social’ Identity Service

Context 2: Institutional centric ‘Social’ Identity Service

Context 3: Federated SP, SP  centric ‘Social’ Identity Service

Context 4: Standalone Service (non federated)

What are the dimensions of ongoing support for the given context? (e.g costs borne by SP's, impact to end users...)

 





How should required attributes be dealt with?

 

 

 

 

 

When 'user' is specified, what are the possible ways to appropriately identify them with a unique identifier?

 

 

 

 

 

What is available as data is 'passed through' to the interior environment?

 

 

 

 

 

What are the benefits / drawbacks of running a gateway in this context?

 

 

 

 

 

What do I have to do as a Service Provider to leverage this particular model?

 

 

 

You may have additional registrations to perform for your service for each endpoint you want to allow in