Agenda

• Strategies and criteria
  • Should running your own Shib idp be added for comparison?
  • Arrive at consensus for final set of alternatives
  • Get volunteer fact-finders for each strategy

Call Notes

Mark Beadles, OARnet
Mark Scheible, MCNC R&E network
Steven Carmody, Brown University
Scott Koranda, Spherical Cow
Shaun Abshere, WiscNet
Dan Zweifel, Washington U St. Louis
Emmet Culley, CCC
Ben Poliakoff, Reed College
David Walker, Internet2
Janemarie Duh, Lafayette College
Tom Scavo, Internet2

• Strategies and assessment criteria grid
  • Rows
    • IDaaS
      • Do we need a glossary of terms? Could get confusing to write.
      • Describe IDaaS as out of scope
      • Add examples to strategies, e.g., Netherlands for Hub and Spoke
    • Add Shib in a Box as separate row
  • Columns
    • Authentication is out of scope for SAML
      • Change MFA and assurance to Multiple SAML Authn context (to what extent? could be 0, 1, or multiple)
    • Group entity attributes with attribute release?
      • No
    • Attribute release
      • Clarify
        • What can be provided by the local IdMS?
        • What can the data elements be?
        • What needs to be facilitated for the release?

Action Items

• Add Shib in a Box as row
  • Tap Chris from CANARIE for factfinder
• David and Janemarie do sample strategy doc and template